Tag Archives: notes from the revolution

reclaiming domesticity

If someone had told me 10 years ago that I would find myself tip-toeing up to my 29th birthday, married, expecting a baby and living as a housewife, I would have scoffed.

I started university young, a wide-eyed 17 year old, and spent my time there making art firmly rooted in a feminist tradition, taking classes about the women Art History 101 forgot to mention, writing papers on The Cult of Domesticity.  My coffee cup back then proudly proclaimed “Domestically Disabled”. And I was, no word of a lie.

I am still a feminist, through and through, and (I hate to admit it) am still slightly handicapped when it comes to efficient housekeeping. And yet, here I am.

Continue reading

joel salatin, you rock my world.

WOW. What an amazing weekend.

I have to say, what with all the morning sickness, anxiety around quitting my job and all that fun stuff – I haven’t exactly been spending my time being excited about gardening and food security and changing the world.

This weekend was a booster-shot of optimism. We were lucky enough to score tickets to see Joel Salatin in Courtenay, BC on Sunday. He was here in Vancouver the next day at UBC, but we thought seeing him in the tiny town of Courtenay would provide a much more intimate experience than in some huge lecture hall at UBC. WAS IT EVER!!

So despite the 2 hour ferry ride and 2 hour drive to get there – off we went! For our travels we were rewarded with the opportunity to participate in a 2 1/2 hour round table discussion with Joel and maybe only 35 or so other folks followed by an evening lecture and Q&A. I had a hard time expressing the enormity of this opportunity to my friends . . . Ah, It’s like getting to sit down and chat with your favourite rockstar!! But he’s a farmer. Um ya. So maybe some of my friends weren’t as excited for me as we were . . . but that’s ok.

It was an interesting mix of people; chefs, food activists, permaculture educators, high school home-ec teachers, a sheep farmer, backyard gardeners, seed-savers, back-to-the land hippies, far-out left-wing airy-fairy-types, food scientists, stay-at-home renegade mums, you name it.

Joel, despite his lack of coveralls (everyone was thrown off by his suit jacket – whispers of “Where’s his straw hat?” rippled through the room) was his adjective-spewing,  pontificiating, chuckel-inducing, no-holds-barred self that we’ve all come to know and love from Food Inc. and YouTube. I spend the entire day madly scribbling down pearls of wisdom, laughing, nodding my head and feeling the circulation slowly returning to the parts of my brain responsible for inspiration.

skunks

one of our orphaned skunks

As though I need any more excitement in my life.

The wedding is barely more than two weeks away and I suddenly find myself with something else to worry about. Skunks. Baby skunks. Orphans. Great.

A few weeks ago I was standing bleary eyed in the kitchen with my morning coffee when suddenly a big cat crawled under my back gate. A great big cat. A black and white cat. With a striped tail. SKUNK!!

See, you think that living in the city you get a break from all heaven’s creatures, great and small, but that’s just not the case. I might not have to contend with dreaded deer damage in the garden – instead of their beautiful (tasty) selves, I get this. Under the chicken coop no less. Hooray.

So we thought, no problem. He’ll leave at night to get food and we’ll just block the entrance to his den. Yep well, good in theory, in practice, not so much.

We piled a ton of lumber between the shed and the fence, thinking ourselves very smart. Only to remove it the next day to find a tiny little black and white mewling ball, eyes not even open, being bothered nearly to death by flies. These are times when the city girl in me comes out. Rather than drown it or who knows what of course it becomes a moral dilemma and next thing poor Jeff is spending the better part of the day making sure it doesn’t die before it’s mother gets home. Good grief. And after all that work we found ourselves right back where we started – a family of skunks camped out under the chicken coop.

Ok so Plan B. We’ll wait long enough for the kittens to be mobile and then we’ll trap mum and the kittens will follow. Again, great in theory. Yep.

Friday night Jeff rolls home from work and calls me outside. Commuters heading both directions on our street were holding their noses in the crooks of their arms, faces squashed up in grimaces. And then it hit me, SKUNK. Well, actually, it hit her. There she was in the middle of the road. Toast.

So technically that was one problem solved, but now I have another:

our four foraging orphans

There they are, apparently munching on my rapini seedlings. I held myself back from actually feeding them, but I did give them some water. I told myself because I can’t have them die under my shed . . . But mostly because they are just too darn cute!

The men of the house had been operating under the assumption that baby skunks can’t spray. Well I think we officially debunked that one on Saturday. Either that or they SERIOUSLY misjudged these little guys age. My sister, who finds our backyard farm amusing, but will have none of it – was into the house like a shot while the rest of us killed ourselves laughing and tried not to gag. Never a dull moment.

Jeff emerged from his emergency shower to report that apparently my AHA face scrub did a pretty good job cutting the stink. Note to self.

I had thought about getting a new perfume for the wedding, something that would remind me of the day. Eau de Pepe La Peau was not what I had in mind . . .

Bill C-474 moves forward!

Chock one up for the little guy!

Thanks for everyone who wrote to their MP’s regarding this important issue. There is a long fight ahead but the vote last week is an important step in the right direction. It is heartening to see that once in a while our voices can be heard over the hollering (and big money) of the agri-industry.

Keep writing and sharing information about this important issue. The best offense we have against this kind of insanity is to arm ourselves with knowledge and to speak out.

First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win.                                        - Ghandhi

Here are a couple of press releases from the NFU and CBAN:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE APRIL 15, 2010

PASSAGE OF C-474 IMPORTANT VICTORY FOR FARMERS

SASKATOON, Sask.—“Yesterday’s vote to send Bill C-474 forward to the Agriculture Committee for detailed analysis and debate is an important victory and major step in trying to protect farmers and the Canadian economy from the economic disaster that GM crops can create,” said NFU President Terry Boehm.

As the text of the Bill states, C-474 would “require that an analysis of potential harm to export markets be conducted before the sale of any new genetically engineered seed is permitted.”

Boehm said: “Triffid flax has demonstrated the serious consequences GM contamination can have.  It is time now for the Agriculture Committee to make the Bill a functional reality in our regulatory system—it is not time to kill the idea of market harm assessment.”

“This bill will not impede innovation,” said Boehm.  “Instead, it will make innovators conscious that their work needs to benefit a broad cross-section of society—not just the company selling the product.  This is only logical for a healthy society and economy.”

Boehm urged MPs not to be swayed by pressure or threats from biotech companies.  “The biotech industry has threatened Canadians before; companies said that they would pull out and shut down research when citizens overwhelmingly wanted their food labelled for GM content.  MPs bought that bogus argument at the time.  Let’s hope that MPs do not accept it with regard to C-474.  Unfortunately, most Conservatives MPs have already bought that argument—with the exception of two brave Members from that party.  Let’s hope the rest of our minority-Parliament MPs act for farmers and citizens and do not accept the threats of the biotech industry. We will all be stronger and better off if they stand up to these threats,” said Boehm.

Boehm dismissed arguments that our system must be guided solely by so-called “science-based” calculations.  He said: “There is an almost superstitious belief that ‘science-based’ means infallible or beyond question—that someone has ‘proven’ food A or B is 100% safe.  In reality, so-called science-based assessments are largely based on data submitted by companies seeking to sell products.  The data is the result of limited testing.  And there is little independent verification done in government labs.  Most important, so-called science-based assessment of human-health safety or ‘substantial equivalence’ is largely a simple risk assessment—primarily a mathematical calculation of probability.  Once we realize this, it is only rational to ask: In what way is this mathematical probability assessment of human health harm superior to a mathematical assessment of market harm?  Why should an economic analysis which is also mathematically based be so scary to the biotech industry?”

“All farmers and Canadians should act promptly to ensure Bill C-474 becomes law,” concluded Boehm.

—30—

For more information:

Terry Boehm, NFU President:                     (306) 255-2880

Darrin Qualman, Director of Research:         (306) 652-9465

MPs listen to Canadians ahead of industry on GM Crops

Groups applaud MPs for moving Bill C-474 to Committee for study

For Immediate Release

Ottawa. Thursday, April 15, 2010 – Last night, Parliament passed Private Members Bill C-474 through second reading, in spite of intense pressure from the biotech industry. The Bill, which would require analysis of potential harm to export markets before the sale of new genetically modified (GM) seeds, will now be studied by the House of Commons Agriculture Committee.

“Finally MPs are taking steps to protect farmers from the economic chaos that GM crops can cause,” said Terry Boehm, President of the National Farmers Union, “GM contamination has already seriously damaged major export markets for Canadian flax farmers and would threaten the markets for our alfalfa and wheat growers.”

The NDP and Bloc Quebecois supports the Bill and last night Liberal Party MPs voted to allow the Bill to go to this next stage. The Conservative Party strongly opposes the Bill, though two B.C. Conservative MPs voted in favour. The Bill was introduced by Alex Atamanenko, NDP Agriculture Critic and MP for B.C. Southern Interior.

“Last night, the majority of MPs listened to Canadians instead of the biotech industry,” said Lucy Sharratt, Coordinator of the Canadian Biotechnology Action Network, “MPs will now have the opportunity to study and debate this Bill. We are witnessing the first substantive debate in Parliament over the negative impacts of GM crops.”

The biotech industry lobbied vigorously to stop the upcoming debate at Committee. Yet the strength of public and farmer concern over GM crops was apparent to MPs. Over 9000 thousand letters were sent from constituents in the past month asking MPs to support the Bill. At least 6 MPs were also presented with petitions.

Bill C-474 was supported by the National Farmers Union, which urged Parliamentarians and all Canadians, to support the Bill. The Canadian Federation of Agriculture took a cautious stance in favour of moving the Bill forward, to encourage debate at Committee.

“The current GM flax contamination crisis shows the value of this Bill. And the threat of GM alfalfa has made the Bill an urgent necessity,” said Sharratt. Canadian flax export markets closed in October 2009 when GM contamination was detected.

“We will not stand by and watch farmers struggle alone against the corporate juggernaut of biotechnology,” said Sharratt, “The time when Canadians are expected to accept GM crops without question, is over.”

-30-

For more information: Terry Boehm, National Farmers Union, 306 255 2880;  Lucy Sharratt, Canadian Biotechnology Action Network, 613 241 2267 ext.6.

beyond factory farming speaks on GE alfalfa

Here’s the latest from beyond factory farming:

Here is what Beyond Factory Farming submitted to the USDA in response to
their call for public input on the Environmental Assessment of
Glyphosate Tolerant Alfalfa. In the States, when they approve a GMO for
environmental release and sale they “deregulate it”. Glyphosate Tolerant
(GT) is Roundup Ready. There are serious implications for sustainable
agriculture in Canada if it is grown n the USA. Read our submission to
learn more.

The USDA’s comment period closes on March 3. You can find out more about
the issue and submit your own comment using the Canadian Biotechology
Action Network’s handy web page at http://www.cban.ca

Numbers of submissions will make a difference, so please take a few
minutes to put in your own.

Thanks!
_________________

Glyphosate Tolerant Alfalfa and Sustainable Livestock Production
Submission opposed to the deregulation of gylphosate tolerant alfalfa.

Submitted to the USDA on behalf of Beyond Factory Farming, Feburary 2010.

The USDA is considering deregulating genetically engineered glyphosate
tolerant alfalfa (also known as Roundup Ready Alfalfa). This would lead
to the unconfined release of the plant into the North American environment.

Beyond Factory Farming is a national organization in Canada that
promotes socially responsible livestock production. Socially responsible
livestock production ensures that the costs of livestock production are
not externalized onto neighbours and the public, and also ensures that
livestock production promotes positive social values such as health,
biodiversity, water quality, community economic development, animal
welfare and fair livelihoods for workers and farmers.

The deregulation of glyphosate tolerant alfalfa in the United States
threatens socially responsible livestock production in Canada as well as
the United States.

Beyond Factory Farming supports certified organic farming, particularly
mixed farming that includes livestock, as well as the certified organic
production of feed crops. Beyond Factory Farming also promotes grass-fed
livestock production, also know as pastured beef, pork and poultry.

If glyphosate tolerant alfalfa is grown commercially in the United
States it will inevitably cross-pollinate with non-genetically
engineered alfalfa which is grown on conventional and organic farms, as
well as with feral alfalfa which grows wild in ditches, wilderness areas
and abandoned fields. Alfalfa is insect-pollinated by both domestic
pollinators (leaf-cutter bees, honeybees) and wild pollinators. Cross
pollination will occur as a result of foraging activities of
pollinators. Seed produced as a result of cross pollination will carry
the DNA of glyphosate tolerant alfalfa, and will confer the trait on its
progeny.

The contamination of non-genetically engineered alfalfa crops will
result in the eventual contamination of alfalfa seed stock, through
cross pollination and/or admixture. Since the use of genetically
engineered seed is prohibited in certified organic agriculture, it will
become increasingly difficult to impossible for farmers to find seed
which does not contain genetically engineered DNA. Further, the farmers
will risk cross-pollination of their crops from neighbouring
contaminated stands and roadside plants. Organic certification rules
require that farmers take measures to eliminate any contamination from
genetically engineered plants that may occur on their farms. In
practice, this will mean that in order to maintain organic
certification, alflafa will not be able to be grown on organic farms.

Without alfalfa being grown on organic farms, there will be a severe
loss of feed for certified organic livestock and dairy production.
Alfalfa is an important, nutritious feed, particularly in northern areas
where feed must be stockpiled as hay for the winter months. The alfalfa
plant is able to fix atmospheric nitrogen and convert it into a form of
nitrogen useable by plants through a symbiotic relationship it has with
certain soil bacteria that colonize its roots. Alfalfa is thus able to
increase soil fertility, which improves productivity of farmland. The
nitrogen that alfalfa makes biologically available is also converted to
plant protein within the plant itself. This is why alfalfa is such an
important feed crop for meat and dairy animals which have high protein
requirements.

Canadian consumers are increasingly turning to certified organic foods.
The growth in the organic sector is approximately 20% per year. Organic
meat and dairy is an area poised for even greater growth as processing
capacity is developed. In addition there is a high proportion of
imported organic food from the USA. The introduction of genetically
engineered alfalfa will reduce volume and the range of products that can
be sold organically, as the loss of organic alfalfa will have a severe
impact on the viability of organic dairy, beef, and pork production.

Canadian consumers of grassfed beef and pork are health conscious and
environmentally conscious. The strong points for pastured meat include
its higher proportion of healthy fats and its environmental benefits,
such as biodiversity, erosion-prevention, and carbon sequestration
resulting from year-round cover – all of which occur when land is grazed
rather than cultivated. The infiltration of glyphosate tolerant alfalfa
into these lands would compromise the product’s health claims, reduce
the sector’s customer base, and lead to a smaller market and smaller
land base for this type of environmentally friendly animal husbandry.

Canadians are concerned about the impacts of deregulation of glyphosate
tolerant alfalfa in the United States for two main reasons:
contamination of alfalfa through imports to US hay and seed, and
simultaneous deregulation of genetically engineered alfalfa in the
Canadian jurisdiction.

Canada’s process for approving (deregulating) genetically engineered
crops has several stages. Health Canada must approve crops for food and
feed safety, and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) must approve
crops for environmental release. Canada requires crop seed varieties to
be registered through the CFIA before they can be sold or used to grow a
commerical crop. No variety of glyphosate tolerant alfalfa seed has yet
been registered in Canada, so it is still illegal to grow or sell
glyphosate tolerant alfalfa in Canada.

Canada’s regulatory system has been strongly criticized by farmers for
not taking into account the impact of genetically engineered varieties
upon markets. There is a strong movement of farm organizations seeking a
reversal of Canada’s environmental release of glyphosate tolerant
alfalfa. Monsanto and Forage Genetics International have stated their
intention to commercialize glyphosate tolerant alfalfa in Canada and the
United States simlutaneously. Therefore, it is important to us to ensure
that deregulation does not occur in the USA, as it would promote the
fast-tracking of variety registration, leading to deregulation of the
crop in Canada as well.

Because glyphosate tolerant alfalfa has been approved for health safety
and environmental release it would be possible for hay produced from
glyphosate tolerant alfalfa from the USA to be imported into Canada if
the crop is deregulated in your country. It is very important to protect
the integrity of Canada’s alfalfa, and thus our certified organic farms,
by preventing contamination by imported hay, which may contain viable
seed. If American hay contains genetically engineered alfalfa Canadian
farmers may need to implement a de facto boycott of risky imports.

We strongly urge you to deny the application to deregulate glyphosate
tolerant alfalfa in the United States. The negative impacts of
deregulaton are broad, significant, far-reaching, and irreversible. The
beneficiaries of deregulation are not disadvantaged, and their interests
should not be put ahead of those of the larger population and future
generations.

Sincerely,
Cathy Holtslander, on behalf of
Beyond Factory Farming
#200 – 416 22nd Street East
Saskatoon, SK
S7K 0C2